Compositions and methods for controlling diseases in animals

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein are compositions for the treatment of a disease in an animal including yeast extract of  Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus licheniformis  or  Bacillus subtilis  spores, and a carrier. Also included are animal feed compositions including the composition for the prevention, control and/or treatment of a disease in an animal and an animal&#39;s food/feed. The compositions are useful to prevent, control, and treat diseases such as necrotic enteritis in poultry when used in combination with an anticoccidal ionophore or coccidiosis vaccine.

This application claims benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of U.S. Provisionalpatent Application Ser. No. 61/187,316 filed Jun. 3, 2009, U.S.Provisional patent Application Ser. No. 61/156,902 filed Mar. 3, 2009and U.S. Provisional patent Application Ser. No. 61/121,258 filed Dec.10, 2008.

BACKGROUND

Pigs and poultry, especially those which are intensively reared orreared in large-scale operations, have a tendency to suffer from or riskcatching a variety of diseases and infections, for example, Mycoplasmadiseases in pigs and poultry, Lawsonia infections (ileitis) and swinedysentery in pigs and necrotic enteritis in poultry. Medicaments havebeen proposed or used for the treatment of individual diseases orinfections of these types.

L. intracellularis, the causative agent of porcine proliferativeenteropathy

(PPE; also called ileitis in swine), affects virtually all animals,including: rabbits, ferrets, hamsters, fox, horses, and other animals asdiverse as ostriches and emus. PPE is a common diarrheal disease ofgrowing-finishing and young breeding pigs characterized by hyperplasiaand inflammation of the ileum and colon. It often is nnld andself-limiting but sometimes causes persistent diarrhea, severe necroticenteritis, or hemorrhagic enteritis with high mortality.

Necrotic enteritis (NE) in poultry is caused by a gram-positive,anaerobic bacteria Clostridium perfringens. The disease is an acuteenterotoxemia condition primarily affecting 2-5 week old broilerchickens and 7-12 week old turkeys. The duration of the illness is veryshort, and typically the only sign of the disease is a sudden increasein mortality of the birds.

C. perfringens is a nearly ubiquitous bacteria found in soil, dust,feces, feed, and used poultry litter, and is also an inhabitant of theintestines of healthy chickens. The enterotoxemia that causes thenecrotic enteritis occurs either following an alteration in theintestinal microflora or from a condition that results in damage to theintestinal mucosa (e.g., coccidiosis, mycotoxicosis, salmonellosis,ascarid larvae). High dietary levels of animal byproducts, wheat,barley, oats, or rye predispose birds to the disease. Anything thatpromotes excessive bacterial growth and toxin production or slows feedpassage rate in the small intestine could promote the occurrence ofnecrotic enteritis.

Diagnosis of necrotic enteritis is based on gross lesions and agram-stained smear of a mucosal scraping that exhibits large,gram-positive rods. The gross lesions are primarily found in the smallintestine, which may be ballooned, friable, and contain a foul-smelling,brown fluid. The mucosa is usually covered with a tan to yellowpseudomembrane often referred to as a “Turkish towel” appearance. Thispseudomembrane may extend throughout the small intestine or be only in alocalized area. The disease persists in a flock for 5-10 days, andmortality is 2-50%. Conventional products for preventing necroticenteritis in poultry are medicated feeds containing virginiamycin (20g/ton feed), bacitracin (50 g/ton), and lineomycin (2 g/ton). Medicatedfeeds containing anticoccidial compounds in the ionophore class havealso been helpful in preventing necrotic enteritis. Treatment fornecrotic enteritis is typically by administering bacitracin, penicillin,and lincomycin in the drinking water for 5-7 days. NE has beenidentified as a disease condition that may be prevented or controlled byuse of Direct-Fed Microbials (DFM) products because they act on theintestinal microflora.

Coccidiosis causes considerable economic loss in the poultry industry.The disease is caused by several species of Eimeria including E.tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, E. brunetti, and E. maxima. Stagesof coccidiosis in chicken appear both within the host as well asoutside. The developmental stages in the chicken give rise to amicroscopic egg (called an oocyst) that is passed out in the droppings.Normally, most birds pass small numbers of oocysts in their droppingswithout ill effects, but intensive rearing of domestic chickena providesconditions which permit the build-up of infective oocysts in theenvironment thereby increasing the possibility of coccidiosisinfections. Coccidiosis infections can become noticeable by the thirdday of infection. Symptoms include chickens drooping, stopping feedingand huddling together. Blood starts to appear in the droppings by dayfour and by day eight the chickens are either dead or have started torecover.

Prevention of coccidiosis includes mixing anticoecidial drugs with feed.Ionophores such as salinomycin are the most commonly-used drugs in theUS for coccidiosis prevention. Salinomycin and salts thereof aretypically added to animal feed at a concentration of about 40 to about60 grams per ton of animal feed (0.0044% to 0.0066%). Salimomycin sodiumis the preferred form of salinomycin used in the United States. Narasinis the most commonly-reported ionophore promoted as an aid in NEprevention. Coccidiosis vaccines (Coccivae-B) can also be usedparticularly by those wishing to market antibiotic-free chickens.Coccivac-B is a non-attenuated, live sporulated oocyst coccidiosisvaccine containing E. acervulina, E. mivati, E. maxima and E. tenella.

A need exists for compositions and methods to treat multiple diseases inanimals, particularly diseases of bacterial origin. These compositionsshould be able to be used in combination with other treatments and/orcompositions used for treating other diseases. Optimally thecompositions for treatment of diseases would have a synergistic effectwhen combined either with other compositions or other treatmentregimens.

BRIEF SUMMARY

The present invention is related to compositions and methods fortreatment of disease in animals, particularly poultry. One embodiment ofthe invention is directed to a composition for the treatment of adisease in an animal that includes a yeast extract from Saccharomycescerevisiae, Bacillus licheniformis spores, and optionally a carrier. Anembodiment of the invention is also directed a method for preventing adisease in an animal that includes administering to an animal acomposition containing yeast extract from Saccharomyces cerevisiae,Bacillus licheniformis spores, and optionally a carrier.

The present invention is also directed to a composition for theprevention and/or control of a disease in an animal which includes ayeast extract from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and QST-713 strain ofBacillus subtilis, and optionally a carrier. An embodiment of theinvention is also directed to a method for preventing and/or controllinga disease in an animal that includes administering to the animal aneffective amount of a composition containing a yeast extract fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae and QST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis, andoptionally a carrier.

The present invention is further related to a composition containingabout 50 wt % to about 90 wt % of the cell wall fraction fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae; about 5 wt. % to about 50 wt. % of Bacilluslicheniformis spores, comprising about 4.5×10⁹ to about 2.5×10¹⁰ sporesper gram; and an anticoccidal ionophore. An embodiment of the inventionis also directed to a method for preventing disease in an animal thatincludes vaccinating the animal with a coccidiosis vaccine andadministering to the animal a composition containing about 50 wt. % toabout 90 wt. % of the cell wall fraction from Saccharomyces cerevisiae;about 5 wt. % to about 50 wt. % of the Bacillus licheniformis spores,comprising about 4.5×10⁹ to about 2.5×10¹⁰ spores per gram; and about 0wt. % to 45 wt. % of a Carrier. An embodiment of the invention isadditionally related to a method for decreasing the mortality in ananimal challenged with C. perfringens that includes vaccinating theanimal with a coccidiosis vaccine and administering to the animal acomposition containing about 50 wt. % to about 90 wt. % of the cell wallfraction from Saccharomyces cerevisiae; about 5 wt. % to about 50 wt. %of the Bacillus licheniformis spores, comprising about 4.5×10⁹ to about2.5×10¹⁰ spores per gram; and about 0 wt. % to 45 wt. % of a carrier. Anembodiment of the invention is further directed to a method fordecreasing the necrotic enteritis lesions in an animal challenged withC. perfringens which includes vaccinating the animal with a coccidiosisvaccine and administering to the animal a composition comprising about50 wt. % to about 90 wt. % of the cell wall fraction from Saocharomycescerevisiae; about 5 wt. % to about 50 wt. % of the Bacilluslicheniformis spores, comprising about 4.5×10⁹ to about 2.5×10¹⁰ sporesper gram; and about 0 wt. % to 45 wt. % of a carrier.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed herein are unexpectedly synergistic combinations of probioticbacteria such as B. licheniformis and immune-enhancing yeast cell wallextracts comprising beta-glucans and mannans used for the prevention,control, and treatment of necrotic enteritis in combination with acoccidiostat or coccidiosis vaccine. These compositions (otherwisecalled an animal feed additive) suitable to treat diseases in an animalare particularly useful to treat diseases caused by infection with abacterium such as L. intracellularis or C. perfringens.

Direct-Fed Microbials (DFM) are living microorganisms that are fed toanimals to improve production by modulating the intestinal environmentin the animal and by improving digestion. They help maintain the properbalance of normal gut flora in the gastrointestinal tract. Althoughscientists do not fully understand the mechanism of action of DFMs, itis believed that DFMs may act by attaching themselves to gut surfaces,reducing or preventing harmful organisms from attaching to andcolonizing the gut surface; stimulating intestinal immunity that in turnprovides protection against disease; releasing enzymes that aid indigestion; producing organic acids that alter the pH of the gut andstimulate beneficial organisms; and producing nutrients, such asvitamins. AlCare™ (Alpharma Inc. of Bridgewater, N.J.) is a DFMcontaining a modified strain of B. licheniformis (NCTC 13123). AlCare™contains 1×10¹⁰ spores of B. licheniformis per gram in 70 wt % of acalcium carbonate carrier. One pound of AlCare™ per ton of feed provides2.2×10⁹ colony forming units (cfu) B. licheniformis per pound of feed.

Brewer's yeast is a type of fungus known as S. cerevisiae. Alphamune®(Alpharma Inc. of Bridgewater, N.J.) is a cross-linked naturalpolysaccharide fiber produced from the cell walls of food grade brewer'syeast. The ingredients in Alphamune® are also made under the name ofBeta Mos® (Alpharma Inc. of Bridgewater, N.J.), which is the cell wallfraction of S. cerevisiae after solubilizing and extracting thebiological active materials from within the cell after autolysis.Alphamune® is a combination of beta-glucans and mannans. Thebeta-glucans present in Alphamune® have side chains (1,3-1,6) resultingin a specific complex structure which cannot be broken by glucanase.Beta-glucans Have a strong immune enhancing effect in animals, bindingto macrophages which are activated and secrete cytokines. The S.cerevisiae mannans are polysaccharide-polypeptide complexes whichcontain partially phosphorylated D-mannose residues. Mannans have beenshown to have immunostimulatory effects. Alphamune® generally containsgreater than or equal to about 24 wt. % of beta glucans and less than orequal to about 15 wt. % mannans.

Surprisingly, a combination, and compositions thereof, of QST-713 strainof Bacillus subtilis, sold as a biofungicide, and a yeast extract suchas that from Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing beta-glucans andmannans, i.e., brewer's yeast, may be employed to prevent and/or controldiseases, such as infections in animals caused by a bacterium, e.g., L.intracellularis or Clostridium perfringens.

As described herein above, the present invention further provides acomposition comprising QST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis and a yeastextract such as that from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and optionally acarrier, for the prevention and/or control of diseases in animals, suchas infections, in particular, necrotic enteritis in poultry and swineileitis in pigs.

QST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis is commercially available as abiofungicide under the trade name Serenade® MAX (AgraQuest Inc. ofDavis, Calif.). Serenade® MAX is a microbial pesticide based on anaturally occurring strain QST-713 of Bacillus subtilis. It producesthree groups of lipopeptides: iturins, agrastatins/plipastatins andsurfactins that act synergistically to inhibit germ tubes, mycelium andbacterial cells. Serenade® MAX contains 10-15 wt-% of dried Bacillussubtilis QST-715 in a carrier comprising a mixture of inert,non-reactive ingredients and provides a minimum of 7.3×10⁹ cfu ofBacillus subtilis QST-715 per gram of the mixture. Serenade® MAX can beformulated as a wettable powder, a wettable granule and an aqueoussuspension that are applied like any other foliar fungicide. Serenade®MAX is not toxic to non-target and beneficial organisms. Due toSerenade's complex mode of action, environmental friendliness, and broadspectrum control, it is well suited for use in Integrated PestManagement.

As indicated herein above, the composition of the present inventioncomprises QST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis and a yeast extract suchas that from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and optionally a carrier.Preferably, the composition of the present invention comprises theQST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis in an amount ranging from about 5 wt% to about 50 wt %, and more preferably, from about 10 wt % to about 15wt %, based on the total weight of the composition. Preferably, theQST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis component of the composition of thepresent invention contains from about 4.5×10⁹ to about 2.5×10¹⁰ cfu ofQST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis per gram and, more preferably, aminimum of about 7.3×10⁹ cfu of QST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis pergram. As described herein above, the present invention further providesan animal feed composition comprising a combination of QST-713 strain ofBacillus subtilis and a yeast extract such as that from Saccharomycescerevisiae for the prevention and/or control of diseases such asinfections in animals, in particular, necrotic enteritis in poultry andswine ileitis in pigs.

One embodiment of the invention includes a composition for theprevention of disease in an animal comprising a yeast extract from yeastsuch as S. cerevisiae, a probiotic bacterium and an anticoccidalionophore. Anticoccidal ionophores include, but are not limited tosalinomycin, monensin, nigericin, narasin, laidlomycin, noboritomycin,grisorixin, mutalomycin, alborixin, lonomycin, lasalocid maduramicinammonium, semduramicin, and lysecellin. A preferred embodiment of theinvention includes salinomycin (Bio-Cox®; Alpharma Inc. of Bridgewater,N.J.). The anticoccidal ionophone is present in an amount ranging fromabout 0.0033 wt. % to about 0.0099 wt. %, preferably from about 0.0044wt. % to about 0.0066 wt. %.

An embodiment of the invention is directed to a method for preventingdisease in an animal which in⁻:ludes vaccinating the animal with acoccidiosis vaccine and administering to the animal a composition thatcontains yeast such as S. Cerevisiae, a probiotic bacterium, and acarrier. A preferred coccidiosis vaccine is Coccivac®-B (Schering PloughAnimal Health Corporation), a non-attenuated, live sporulated oocystcoccidiosis vaccine containing E. acervuline, E. mivati, E. maxima andE. tenella.

The composition optionally comprises a carrier. A number of suitable drycarriers may be organic or inorganic. Exemplary inorganic carriersinclude, salts such as calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, and the like.Suitable organic carriers include lactose and the like. Small amounts ofother flow control agents, for example silica, may also be used.Mixtures comprising one or more of the foregoing may also be used.

The composition comprises a yeast extract such as one from S.cerevisiae. Specifically, the cell wall fraction comprises beta-glucansand mannans. The cell wall fraction is produced, for example, bymechanically ruptured cells. The yeast extract is present in an amountof about 50 wt. % to about 90 wt. %, specifically about 50 wt. % toabout 85 wt. % and more specifically about 50 wt. % to about 55 wt. %,based on the total weight of the composition. In one embodiment, thebeta-glucan has (1,3-1,6) side chains and is resistant to cleavage byglucanase. In another embodiment, the mannans arepolysaccharide-polypeptide complexes, partially phosphorylated D-mannoseresidues. The yeast extract comprises about 40 wt. % to about 85 wt. %cell walls, specifically about 40 wt. % to about 45 wt. % cell walls.

B. licheniformis is present in an amouht of about 5 wt. % to about 50wt. %, and specifically about 7.5 wt. % to about 12.5 wt. %, based onthe total weight of the composition. The B. licheniformis componentcomprises about 4.5×10⁹ to about 2.5×10¹⁰ cfu per gram, and specificallyabout 5×10⁹ to about 1.25×10¹⁰ cfu per gram, based on the total weightof the composition.

The carrier is present in an amount of 0 wt. % to 45 wt. %, specificallyabout 5 wt. % to about 40 wt. %, and more specifically about 37.5 wt. %to about 42.5 wt. %, based on the total weight of the composition.

In one embodiment, the composition suitable for treatment of a diseasein an animal is administered in an animal foodstuff. Manufacturedfoodstuffs for animals such as cattle, pigs, and fowl are usuallyprovided in the form of pellets or similar particulate material. Pelletsare typically manufactured by combining a cereal base with ingredientssuch as oil and protein, steam conditioning the mixture (for example at70° C. for 5 minutes), extruding the mixture through a circular die(typically between 2 mm and 15 mm in diameter), cutting intoappropriately sized lengths (e.g., 5-20 mm), and drying. The finishedpellets are generally cylindrically shaped and have a relatively smoothsurface.

In one embodiment, an animal feed composition is prepared by adding ananimal feed additive composition to an animal foodstuff. The animal feedadditive composition may be added to the food in a number of ways. Theanimal feed additive composition containing a given quantity of activeingredients may be added to a given quantity of feed and mixed orblended to provide a substantially homogeneous medicated feedcomposition. Large feed lots may be prepared in this manner for treatinga large number of animals. Alternatively, feed batches containing feedfor a single animal or single meal may be prepared either by mixing apredetermined quantity of animal feed additive composition with theanimal feed or by adding a predetermined quantity of premix to ananimal's feed as a top dressing.

In another embodiment, an animal feed composition comprises acomposition suitable for treatment of a disease in an animal and ananimal foodstuff, wherein the composition suitable for treatment of adisease in an animal is present in an amount of about 0.5 pounds toabout 10 pounds, specifically about 1 pound to about 5 pounds, morespecifically about 1.5 pounds to about 2.5 pounds, and most specifically2 pounds of the composition suitable for treatment of a disease in ananimal to a ton of animal foodstuff (mash or pellet forms). In oneembodiment, the animal foodstuff may be a poultry foodstuff. In anotherembodiment, the animal foodstuff may be a swine foodstuff.

The invention is further illustrated by the following non-limitingexamples.

EXAMPLES Example 1

One-day-old healthy broiler male chicks (Cobb×Cobb) chicks were obtainedfrom Cobb-Vantress Hatchery of Cleveland, Ga. Upon arrival, the chickswere raised in Petersime battery cages. Eight birds were placed in eachcage. A thermostatically controlled gas furnace/air conditionermaintained uniform temperature and even continuous illumination wasprovided. Water was available ad libitum through the trial. The chickswere divided into groups containing 48 chicks. Two control treatmentgroups were fed an unmedicated commercial type chicken starter rationcompounded with feedstuffs commonly used in the United States. One group(designated AlCare 0.5 Group) was fed AlCare™ (Alpharma of Bridgewater,N.J.), a DFM product containing 1.0×10¹⁰ spores of B. Licheniformis pergram, at a rate of 0.5 pound per ton. Another group (AlCare 1 Group) wasfed AlCare™ at a rate of 1.0 pound per ton. Two separate groups were fedAlphamune® (Alpharma of Bridgewater, N.J.), a brewer's yeast(Saccharomyces cerevisiae) extract for use in animal feeds, at a rate of1 pound per ton (Alphamune 1 Group) and 2 pounds per ton (Alphamune 2Group), respectively. Further groups were fed both AlCare and Alphamuneat rates of AlCare 0.5 pound per ton plus Alphamune 1 pound per ton,AlCare 1 pound per ton plus Alphamune 1 pound per ton, AlCare 0.5 poundper ton plus Alphamune 2 pounds per ton, and AlCare 1 pound per ton plusAlphamune 2 pounds per ton.

The chicks were fed for 28 days. All dead birds dying during the studywere weighed and necropsied for the presence of necrotic enteritis (NE)lesions. All groups were challenged orally with Eimeria maxima (5,000oocysts per bird) on Day 14. All treatments except a control (NC) werechallenged with C. perfringens (broth culture of C. perfringens 10⁸cfu/ml) on days 19, 20, and 21. On Day 22, three birds from each cagewere lesion scored for NE. The trail was terminated on day 28. Theresults of the trials are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Necrotic Mortality % Enteritis Necrotic Treatments Lesion ScoreEnteritis Control 0 0 Challenged Control 1.11 20.83 AlCare 0.5 0.56 6.25AlCare 1 0.56 6.25 Alphamune 1 0.72 10.42 Alphamune 2 0.94 12.50 AlCare0.5 + Alphamune 1 0.44 12.50 AlCare 1 + Alphamune 1 0.28 2.08 AlCare0.5 + Alphamune 2 0.72 10.42 AlCare 1 + Alphamune 2 0.56 6.25

Example 2

One-day-old healthy broiler male chicks (Cobb×Cobb) chicks were obtainedfrom Cobb-Vantress Hatchery of Cleveland, Ga. Upon arrival, fifty birdswere allocated to each treatment pen by blocks. For environmentalcontrol there were ambient humidity and twenty-four hour lighting. Gasheaters were the primary heat source with a heat lamp in each pen forsupplemental heat as required during the brooding period. Fans andsidewall curtains manipulation were used for ventilation and to cool thebirds. Water was available ad libitum through the trial. Two controltreatment groups were fed a non-medicated commercial type chickenstarter, grower and finisher rations compounded with foodstuffs commonlyused in the United States. One group, designated as SM Group, was fedSerenade® MAX at a rate of 91 g per ton of foodstuff. Another group,designated as SM+Alphamune® (AM) Group, was fed both Serenade® MAX at arate of 91 g per ton of foodstuff and Alphamune® at a rate of 1 lb perton of foodstuff. The treatments were replicated in six blocks andrandomized.

The chicks were fed ad libitum from the date of chick arrival until Day42 of the study. All dead birds dying during the study were weighed andnecropsied for the presence of necrotic enteritis (NE) lesions. Allgroups were challenged orally with Eimeria maxima (5,000 oocysts perbird) on Day 14. All treatment groups except one of the control groups(NC) were challenged with C. perfringens (CP, broth culture of C.perfringens 10⁸ cfu/mL) on days 19, 20 and 21. On Day 22, five birdsfrom each pen were lesion scored for NE. The trial was terminated on day42, and the results are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Necrotic Mortality % Enteritis Necrotic Treatments Lesion ScoreEnteritis Control (NC) 0.17 1.00 Challenged Control (CP) 1.30 30.33Serenade^( ®) MAX (SM); CP 0.77 21.00 SM + Alphamune^( ®) (AM); CP 0.5017.00

Example 3

One-day-old healthy male broiler chicks (Cobb×Cobb) were obtained from ahatchery where they were sexed and received routine vaccination(HVTSB1). Only healthy-appearing chicks were used in the study. No birdswere replaced during the course of the study. Upon arrival, chicks wereraised in litter floor pens. There were 50 birds placed per pen. Penswere blocked by location in the house. Each treatment appeared oncewithin each block. Thermostatically-controlled gas furnaces maintaineduniform temperature. Water was available ad libitum throughout thetrial.

All birds were weighed by pcn on days 0, 21, and 42. Starter, grower,and finisher feed consumptions were measured from days 0 to 21, 21 to35, and 35 to 42, respectively. The study was terminated on day 42. OnDay 22, five birds from each pen were lesion scored for NE. The scoringwas based on a 0 to 3 score, with 0 being normal and 3 being the mostsevere. The scoring was as follows: 0 for normal intestines, 1 forslight mucus covering and loss of tone, 2 for severe necrotizingenteritis, and 3 for extreme necrotizing enteritis with presence ofblood in the lumen. Birds dying during the study were weighed andnecropsied for the presence of NE. All birds from the study weredisposed of at the research facility. Mortality was summarized as totaland those resulting from NE.

A total of eight different regimens were tested. All groups werechallenged orally with Eimeria maxima (5,000 oocysts per bird) on Day14. All treatments except a control (NC) and a treatment group withAlCare and Alphamune (Group AA-NC) were challenged with C. perfringens(broth culture of C. perfringens 10⁸ cfu/ml) on days 19, 20, and 21.Control feeds did not contain AlCare™ (AC), Alphamune® (AM), orSalinomycin (S). Control groups were not spray vaccinated using aSpraycox® (Schering Plough Animal Health Corporation) machine with thelabel recommended dosage on day of hatch. The groups were designated asfollows:

Group NC (unchallenged control): Group NC was fed an unmedicatedcommercial type chicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffscommonly used in the United States and was unchallenged by C.perfringens.

Group CP (challenged control): Group CP was fed an unmedicatedcommercial type chicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffscommonly used in the United States and was challenged by C. perfringensas described above.

Group AA, NC (AlCare™ and Alphamune® fed; unchallenged): Group AA, NCwas fed a commercial type chicken starter ration compounded withfeedstuffs commonly used in the United States plus AlCare™ at a rate of1.0 pound per ton and Alphamune® at a rate of 1 pound per ton. Thisgroup was not challenged.

Group AA, CP (AlCare™ and Alphamune® fed; challenged) was fed acommercial type chicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffscommonly used in the United States plus AlCare™ at a rate of 1.0 poundper ton and Alphamune® at a rate of 1 pound per ton. This group waschallenged as described above.

Group S, CP (salinomycin treated, challenged) was fed a commercial typechicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffs commonly used in theUnited States plus salinomycin (66 ppm) and was challenged as describedabove.

Group S, AA, CP(salinomycin treated, AlCare™ and Alphamune® fed;challenged) was fed a commercial type chicken starter ration compoundedwith feedstuffs commonly used in the United States plus AlCare™ at arate of 1.0 pound per ton and Alphamune® at a rate of 1 pound per tonplus salinomycin (66 ppm). This group was challenged as described above.

Group CV, CP (Coccivac®-B treated; challenged) was spray vaccinatedusing a Spraycox® machine (Schering-Plough Animal Health Corporation)with the label recommended dosage on day of hatch and fed was fed acommercial type chicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffscommonly used in the United States. This group was challenged asdescribed above.

Group CV, AA, CP (Coccivac®-B treated; challenged) was spray vaccinatedusing a Spraycox® machine with the label recommended dosage on day ofhatch and fed was fed a commercial type chicken starter rationcompounded with feedstuffs commonly used in the United States plusAlCare™ at a rate of 1.0 pound per ton and Alphamune® at a rate of 1pound per ton. This group was challenged as described above.

Statistics were carried out using SAS® (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.,USA, 2002) in the analyses of the data. Additional analyses wereperformed comparing AA with the anticoccidial program with and withoutAA.

Calculations of pen data used in the statistical analyses were performedusing SAS. Average bird weight gains were calculated for the 0 to 21, 0to 42, and 21 to 42-days periods. For the NE lesion scores, the penaverage of the five birds selected for NE lesion scoring on Day 22 werecalculated. The feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated on a penbasis for the 0 to 21, 0 to 42, and 21 to 42 days periods withadjustments made for dead and removed birds. The percentages of totalmortality and those mortalities caused by NE were calculated. Anyreference made to the performance of the chickens would be referring toeffects on weight gain and/or FCR.

This study was conducted using a randomized complete block design. Therewere 6 blocks. The pen of birds was the experimental unit. The modelincluded block and treatment. Block was a random effect. Treatment was afixed effect, so the model was mixed.

The summary variables include performance data and data related to theNE challenge for each pen. A mixed model analysis was performed on thedata using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS.

The results of the trials are shown in Tables 3-8. In the tables thefollowing abbreviations are used:

AA=AlCare+Alphamune

S=salinomycin

CV=Coccivac®-B

CP=Challenged

NC=Not Challenged

TABLE 3 Effects of dietary AlCare plus Alphamune on weight gains ofbroiler chickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litterfloor pens. Average Average Weight weight Gain (kg) (kg) Days 0 Days 0Days 21 Treatments Day 0 to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) .044 .515 1.8921.377 Challenge Control (CP) .044 .469 1.704 1.235 AA, NC .044 .4971.899 1.403 AA, CP .044 .488 1.861 1.373 S, CP .044 .511 1.993 1.482 S,AA, CP .044 .556 2.085 1.529 CV, CP .044 .479 1.923 1.443 CV, AA, CP.044 .501 2.017 1.516

TABLE 4 Effects of dietary AlCare plus Alphamune on feed conversion andnecrotic enteritis lesions of broiler chickens in a Clostridiumperfringens challenge model in litter floor pens. Feed Conversion RatioNecrotic (feed to gain ratio) Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 21 LesionTreatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Score Control (NC) 1.723 1.943 2.055 0.17Challenged Control (CP) 1.893 2.051 2.183 1.30 AA, NC 1.759 1.896 1.9620.20 AA, CP 1.763 1.921 2.016 0.60 S, CP 1.688 1.876 1.963 0.07 S, AA,CP 1.647 1.824 1.910 0.17 CV, CP 1.792 1.893 1.950 0.30 CV, AA, CP 1.7371.823 1.867 0.33

TABLE 5 Effects of dietary AlCare plus Alphamune on mortality of broilerchickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litter floorpens. Mortality (%) Necrotic All Causes Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 0Treatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) 3.00 9.00 1.00 ChallengedControl (CP) 5.33 35.67 30.33 AA, NC 4.00 9.33 2.67 AA, CP 2.33 18.6711.67 S, CP 3.33 6.00 1.6 S, AA, CP 4.33 7.67 1.00 CV, CP 4.33 25.0019.67 CV, AA, CP 4.00 13.67 5.67

TABLE 6 Effects of dietary AlCare plus Alphamune on weight gains ofbroiler chickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litterfloor pens. Average Average Weight weight Gain (kg) (kg) Days 0 Days 0Days 21 Treatments Day 0 to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) .044 .515 1.8921.377 Challenged Control (CP) .044 .469 1.704 1.235 S, CP .044 .5111.993 1.482 S, AA, CP .044 .556 2.085 1.529 CV, CP .044 .479 1.923 1.443CV, AA, CP .044 .501 2.017 1.516

TABLE 7 Effects of dietary AlCare plus Alphamune on feed conversion andnecrotic enteritis lesions of broiler chickens in a Clostridiumperfringens challenge model in litter floor pens. Feed Conversion RatioNecrotic (feed to gain ratio) Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 21 LesionTreatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Score Control (NC) 1.723 1.943 2.055 0.17Challenged Control (CP) 1.893 2.051 2.183 1.30 S, CP 1.688 1.876 1.9630.07 S, AA, CP 1.647 1.824 1.910 0.17 CV, CP 1.792 1.893 1.950 0.30 CV,AA, CP 1.737 1.823 1.867 0.33

TABLE 8 Effects of dietary AlCare plus Alphamune on mortality of broilerchickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litter floorpens. Mortality (%) Necrotic All Causes Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 0Treatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) 3.00 9.00 1.00 ChallengedControl (CP) 5.33 35.67 30.33 S, CP 3.33 6.00 1.67 S, AA, CP 4.33 7.671.00 CV, CP 4.33 25.00 19.67 CV, AA, CP 4.00 13.67 5.67

Data in Tables 3, 4, and 5 are the comparisons of between the AACPtreatments and the S and CV treatments with and without AA,respectively. The combination of S+AA generally provided the bestperformance of all the treatments. The combination of S+AA providedgreater weight gain from 0 to 21, 0 to 42, 21 to 42 days and better FCRfrom 0 to 21, 0 to 42, and 21 to 42 days, lower NE mortality compared toboth the S and the AACP treatments. The combination of S+AA alsoprovided lower NE lesion scores compared to the AACP treatment.

The combination of CV+AA provided greater weight gain from days 0-21. 0to 42, 21 to 42 and better FCR from 0 to 21, 0 to 42, and 21 to42 dayscompared to both the CV and the AACP treatments (Tables 3 and 4). Thecombination of CV+AA provided lower total mortality from days 0 to 42and lower NE mortality compared to the CV and AACP treatments (Table 5).

Birds medicated with salinomycin with and without AA generally had thebest performance and lower NE lesion scores and mortality comparable toor better than the NC. The addition of AA to the feeds of birds fedsalinomycin tended to improve performance but did not further reduce NElesion scores or mortality. Generally, the addition of AA to the feedsof birds treated with CV improved performance and reduced mortalitycompared to those treated with CV alone. Birds challenged with NE andtreated with a conventional coccidiostat program or a coccidiosisvaccine program can benefit from the addition of AA to their feeds. Datain Tables 6, 7, and 8 allow for direct comparisons of the coccidiosiscontrol programs to each other (with and without AA) and to the controls(challenged and unchallenged). During the 0 to 21 days period, birds fedS+AA had greater weight gains compared to the other treatments (Table6). During the 0 to 21 days period, birds fed S had weight gains thatwere comparable to the NC but greater than the CP. During the 0 to 21days period, birds vaccinated with CV had weight gains that were notdifferent than the NC or CP birds. During the 0 to 42 and 21 to 42 daysperiods, birds treated with CV had greater weight gains compared to theCP birds.

During the 0 to 21 days period, birds fed S+AA had FCR that were betterthan the NC and CP birds (Table 7). During the 0 to 21 days period,birds medicated with S, CV, and CV+AA had FCR that were better than theCP birds. During the 0 to 42 and 21 to 42 days periods, birds treatedwith S, S+AA, CV, and CV+AA had FCR that were better than the NC and CPbirds (Table 7). During the 0 to 42 days period, the addition of AA tothe diets of birds treated with S and CV improved FCR compared to S andCV alone, respectively. During the 21 to 42 days periods the addition ofAA to the diets of birds vaccinated with CV improved FCR compared to CValone.

NE lesion scores of S and CV birds (with and without AA) were comparableto the NC but lower than the CP birds (Table 8). The treatments did notaffect mortality during the 0 to 21 days period (Table 8). Mortality(total and NE) of the S, S+AA, and CV+AA birds were comparable to the NCbut lower than the CP birds (Table 6). Mortality (total and NE) of CVbirds was lower than the CP birds but higher than the NC birds.Mortality (total and NE) of birds treated with CV+AA was lower than withCV alone.

Example 4

One-day-old healthy male broiler chicks (Cobb×Cobb) were obtained from ahatchery where they were sexed and received routine vaccination(HVTSB1). Only healthy-appearing chicks were used in the study. No birdswere replaced during the course of the study. Upon arrival, chicks wereraised in litter floor pens. There were 50 birds placed per pen. Penswere blocked by location in the house. Each treatment appeared oncewithin each block. Thermostatically-controlled gas furnaces maintaineduniform temperature. Water was available ad libitum throughout thetrial.

All birds were weighed by pen on days 0, 21, and 42. Starter, grower,and finisher feed consumptions were measured from days 0 to 21, 21 to35, and 35 to 42, respectively. The study was terminated on day 42. OnDay 22, five birds from each pen were lesion scored for NE. The scoringwas based on a 0 to 3 score, with 0 being normal and 3 being the mostsevere. The scoring was as follows: 0 for normal intestines, 1 forslight mucus covering and loss of tone, 2 for severe necrotizingenteritis, and 3 for extreme necrotizing enteritis with presence ofblood in the lumen. Birds dying during the study were weighed andnecropsied for the presence of NE. All birds from the study weredisposed of at the research facility. Mortality was summarized as totaland those resulting from NE.

A total of nine different regimens were tested. All groups werechallenged orally with Eimeria maxima (5,000 oocysts per bird) on Day14. All treatments except a non-challenged control (NC) were challengedwith C. perfringens (broth culture of C. perfringens 10⁸ cfu/ml) on days19, 20, and 21. Control feeds did not contain Serenade® MAX (QST),Alphamune® (AM), or Salinomycin (S). Control groups were not sprayvaccinated using a Spraycox® machine with the label recommended dosageon day of hatch. The groups were designated as follows:

Group NC (unchallenged control): Group NC was fed an unmedicatedcommercial type chicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffscommonly used in the United States and was unchallenged by C.perfringens.

Group CP (challenged control): Group CP was fed an unmedicatedcommercial type chicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffscommonly used in the United States and was challenged by C. perfringensas described above.

Group AM, CP (Alphamune® fed; challenged): Group AM, CP was fed acommercial type chicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffscommonly used in the United States plus Alphamune® at a rate of 1 poundper ton. This group was challenged.

Group QST, CP (Serenade® MAX fed; challenged) was fed a commercial typechicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffs commonly used in theUnited States plus Serenade® MAX at a rate of 0.25 pound per ton. Thisgroup was challenged as described above.

Group AQST, CP (Alphamune® and Serenade® MAX fed, challenged) was fed acommercial type chicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffscommonly used in the United States plus Alphamune® at a rate of 1 poundper ton and Serenade® MAX at a rate 0f 0.25 pound per ton, and waschallenged as described above.

Group S, CP (salinomycin treated; challenged) was fed a commercial typechicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffs commonly used in theUnited States plus salinomycin (66 ppm). This group was challenged asdescribed above.

Group S, AQST, CP (salinomycin treated, Alphamune® and Serenade® MAXfed; challenged) was fed a commercial type chicken starter rationcompounded with feedstuffs commonly used in the United States plusAlphamune® and Serenade® MAX at a rate of 1.25 pounds per ton andtreated with salinomycin (66 ppm). This group was challenged asdescribed above.

Group CV, CP (Coccivac®-B treated; challenged) was spray vaccinatedusing a Spraycox® machine with the label recommended dosage on day ofhatch and fed was fed a commercial type chicken starter rationcompounded with feedstuffs commonly used in the United States. Thisgroup was challenged as described above.

Group CV, AQST, CP (Coccivac®-B treated, Alphamune® and Serenade® MAXfed; challenged) was spray vaccinated using a Spraycox® machine with thelabel recommended dosage on day of hatch and fed was fed a commercialtype chicken starter ration compounded with feedstuffs commonly used inthe United States pins Alphamune® and Serenade® MAX at a rate of 1.25pounds per ton. This group was challenged as described above.

Statistics were carried out using SAS® (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.,USA, 2002) in the analyses of the data. Additional analyses wereperformed comparing AA with the anticoccidial program with and withoutAA.

Calculations of pen data used in the statistical analyses were performedusing SAS. Average bird weight gains were calculated for the 0 to 21, 0to 42, and 21 to 42-days periods. For the NE lesion scores, the penaverage of the five birds selected for NE lesion scoring on Day 22 werecalculated. The feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated on a penbasis for the 0 to 21, 0 to 42, and 21 to 42 days periods withadjustments made for dead and removed birds. The percentages of totalmortality and those mortalities caused by NE were calculated. Anyreference made to the performance of the chickens would be referring toeffects on weight gain and/or FCR.

This study was conducted using a randomized complete block design. Therewere 6 blocks. The pen of birds was the experimental unit. The modelincluded block and treatment. Block was a random effect. Treatment was afixed effect, so the model was mixed.

The summary variables include performance data and data related to theNE challenge for each pen. A mixed model analysis was performed on thedata using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS.

The results of the trials are shown in Tables 9-17. In the tables thefollowing abbreviations are used:

AM=Alphamune®

QST=Serenade® MAX

AQST=Alphamune plus Serenade® MAX

S=salinomycin

CV=Coccivac®-B

CP=Challenged

NC=Not Challenged

TABLE 9 Effects of dietary Alphamune plus QST on weight gains of broilerchickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litter floorpens. Average Average Weight weight Gain (kg) (kg) Days 0 Days 0 Days 21Treatments¹ Day 0 to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) .044 .615 1.829 1.214Challenged Control (CP) .044 .514 1.753 1.238 AM, CP .045 .579 1.8401.261 QST, CP .044 .595 1.825 1.230 AQST, CP .044 .619 1.891 1.273 S, CP.044 .592 1.856 1.264 S, AQST, CP .044 .605 1.872 1.266 CV, CP .044 .5541.840 1.286 CV, AQST, CP .045 .574 1.883 1.310

TABLE 10 Effects of dietary Alphamune plus QST on feed conversion andnecrotic enteritis lesions of broiler chickens in a Clostridiumperfringens challenge model in litter floor pens. Feed Conversion RatioNecrotic (feed to gain ratio) Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 21 LesionTreatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Score Control (NC) 1.573 1.996 2.261 0.13Challenged Control (CP) 1.818 2.025 2.156 0.90 AM, CP 1.624 1.983 2.1960.20 QST, CP 1.612 1.991 2.234 0.30 AQST, CP 1.566 1.953 2.192 0.13 S,CP 1.550 1.914 2.126 0.10 S, AQST, CP 1.551 1.903 2.111 0.17 CV, CP1.710 1.957 2.094 0.20 CV, AQST, CP 1.611 1.918 2.094 0.07

TABLE 11 Effects of dietary Alphamune plus QST on mortality of broilerchickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litter floorpens. Mortality (%) Necrotic All Causes Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 0Treatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) 1.33 3.33 0.33 ChallengedControl (CP) 6.67 18.33 15.33 AM, CP 2.00 6.00 3.00 QST, CP 1.67 6.675.33 AQST, CP 0.67 5.33 3.00 S, CP 1.67 4.67 1.33 S, AQST, CP 1.33 3.331.00 CV, CP 4.67 8.6 5.33 CV, AQST, CP 2.67 7.33 3.00

TABLE 12 Effects of dietary Alphamune plus QST on weight gains ofbroiler chickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litterfloor pens. Average Average Weight weight Gain (kg) (kg) Days 0 Days 0Days 21 Treatments Day 0 to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) .044 .615 1.8291.214 Challenged Control (CP) .044 .514 1.753 1.238 AM, CP .045 .5791.840 1.261 QST, CP .044 .595 1.825 1.230 AQST, CP .044 .619 1.891 1.273

TABLE 13 Effects of dietary Alphamune plus QST on feed conversion andnecrotic enteritis lesions of broiler chickens in a Clostridiumperfringens challenge model in litter floor pens. Feed Conversion RatioNecrotic (feed to gain ratio) Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 21 LesionTreatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Score Control (NC) 1.573 1.996 2.261 0.13Challenged Control (CP) 1.818 2.025 2.156 0.90 AM, CP 1.624 1.983 2.1960.20 QST, CP 1.612 1.991 2.234 0.30 AQST, CP 1.566 1.953 2.192 0.13

TABLE 14 Effects of dietary Alphamune plus QST on mortality of broilerchickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litter floorpens. Mortality (%) Necrotic All Causes Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 0Treatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) 1.33 3.33 0.33 ChallengedControl (CP) 6.67 18.33 15.33 AM, CP 2.00 6.00 3.00 QST, CP 1.67 6.675.33 AQST, CP 0.67 5.33 3.00

TABLE 15 Effects of dietary Alphamune plus QST on weight gains ofbroiler chickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litterfloor pens. Average Average Weight weight Gain (kg) (kg) Days 0 Days 0Days 21 Treatments Day 0 to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) .044 .615 1.8291.214 Challenged Control (CP) .044 .514 1.753 1.238 AQST, CP .044 .6191.891 1.273 S, CP .044 .592 1.856 1.264 S, AQST, CP .044 .605 1.8721.266 CV, CP .044 .554 1.840 1.286 CV, AQST, CP .045 .574 1.883 1.310

TABLE 16 Effects of dietary Alphamune plus QST on feed conversion andnecrotic enteritis lesions of broiler chickens in a Clostridiumperfringens challenge model in litter floor pens. Feed Conversion RatioNecrotic (feed to gain ratio) Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 21 LesionTreatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Score Control (NC) 1.573 1.996 2.261 0.13Challenged Control (CP) 1.818 2.025 2.156 0.90 AQST, CP 1.566 1.9532.192 0.13 S, CP 1.550 1.914 2.126 0.10 S, AQST, CP 1.551 1.903 2.1110.17 CV, CP 1.710 1.957 2.094 0.20 CV, AQST, CP 1.611 1.918 2.094 0.07

TABLE 17 Effects of dietary Alphamune plus QST on mortality of broilerchickens in a Clostridium perfringens challenge model in litter floorpens. Mortality (%) Necrotic All Causes Enteritis Days 0 Days 0 Days 0Treatments to 21 to 42 to 42 Control (NC) 1.33 3.33 0.33 ChallengedControl (CP) 6.67 18.33 15.33 AQST, CP 0.67 5.33 3.00 S, CP 1.67 4.671.33 S, AQST, CP 1.33 3.33 1.00 CV, CP 4.67 8.67 5.33 CV, AQST, CP 2.677.33 3.00

The addition of AM, QST, and AQST to the feeds of broiler chickensimproved performance compared to the CC. Birds medicated withsalinomycin with and without AQST generally had the best performance andlower NE lesions and mortality comparable to or better than the NC.Generally, the addition of AQST to the feeds of birds treated withCoccivac improved performance and reduced mortality compared to thosetreated with Coccivac alone.

1. A composition for the treatment of a disease in an animal comprising:yeast extract from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus licheniformisspores, and optionally a carrier.
 2. The composition of claim 1,comprising (a) about 50 wt. % to about 90 wt. % of the cell wallfraction from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, (b) about 5 wt. % to about 50wt. % of the Bacillus licheniformis spores, comprising about 4.5×10⁹ toabout 2.5×10¹⁰ spores per gram, and (c) about 0 wt. % to about 45 wt. %of the carrier.
 3. The composition of claim 1, comprising (a) 50 wt. %of the cell wall fraction from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, (b) 10 wt. % ofthe Bacillus licheniformis spores, comprising about 5×10⁹ to about1.25×10¹⁰ spores per gram, and (c) 40 wt. % of the carrier.
 4. Thecomposition of claim 1 wherein the carrier comprises calcium carbonate,calcium sulfate, lactose, or a combination thereof.
 5. An animal feedcomposition comprising the composition for the treatment of a disease inan animal of any one of claims 1-4, and an animal foodstuff; wherein thecomposition for the treatment of a disease in an animal is in an amountof about 0.5 pounds to about 10 pounds per ton of the animal foodstuff.6. The animal feed composition of claim 5, wherein the composition forthe treatment of a disease in an animal is in an amount of about 1 poundto about 5 pounds per ton of the animal foodstuff.
 7. The animal feedcomposition of claim 6, wherein the composition for the treatment of adisease in an animal is in an amount of about 2 pounds per ton of theanimal foodstuff.
 8. The animal food composition of claim 7, whereinanimal foodstuff is a poultry foodstuff or a swine foodstuff.
 9. Amethod for preventing a disease in an animal, comprising administeringto the animal the composition for the treatment of a disease in ananimal of any one of claims 1-8.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein theanimal is poultry and the disease is necrotic enteritis.
 11. The methodof claim 9, wherein the animal is swine and the disease is swineileitis.
 12. A composition for the prevention and/or control of adisease in an animal comprising a yeast extract from Saccharomycescerevisiae and QST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis, and optionally acarrier.
 13. The composition according to claim 12, comprising fromabout 75 wt-% to about 99 wt-% of the yeast extract from Saccharomycescerevisiae; from about 1 wt-% to about 3 wt-% of the QST-713 strain ofBacillus subtilis; and from about 0 wt-% to about 24 wt-% of thecarrier.
 14. The composition according to claim 12, comprising 80 wt-%of the cell wall fraction from Saccharomyces cerevisiae; 2.5 wt-% ofQST-713 strain of Bacillus subtilis; and 17.5 wt-% of the carrier. 15.The composition according to claim 12, wherein the carrier comprisescalcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, lactose, or a combination thereof.16. An animal feed composition comprising a composition according to anyone of claims 12 to 15, and an animal foodstuff, wherein the compositionfor the prevention and/or control of a disease in an animal is presentin an amount ranging from about 0.5 pounds to about 10 pounds per ton ofthe animal foodstuff.
 17. The animal feed composition according to claim16, wherein the composition for the prevention and/or control of adisease in an animal is in an amount of about 1.25 pounds per ton of theanimal foodstuff.
 18. The animal feed composition according to claim 16,wherein animal foodstuff is a poultry foodstuff or a swine foodstuff.19. A method for preventing and/or controlling a disease in an animalcomprising administering to the animal an effective amount of acomposition according to any one of claims 12 to
 18. 20. The methodaccording to claim 19, wherein the animal is poultry and the disease isnecrotic enteritis.
 21. The method according to claim 19, wherein theanimal is swine and the disease is swine ileitis.
 22. A compositioncomprising the composition of any one of claims 1 to 8 furthercomprising an anticoccidal ionophore.
 23. The composition of claim 22,wherein the anticoccidal ionophore is salinomycin.
 24. The compositionof claim 23, wherein the salinomycin is present at a level of about 66ppm of the composition.
 25. An animal feed composition comprising thecomposition for the treatment of necrotic enteritis in an animal of anyone of claims 22 to 24, and an animal foodstuff, wherein the compositionfor the treatment of a disease in an animal is in an amount of about 0.5pounds to about 10 pounds per ton of the animal foodstuff.
 26. A methodfor improving the performance of an ionophore in the treatment ofnecrotic enteritis in an animal comprising administering to the animalthe composition of any one of claims 22 to
 25. 27. The method of claim26 wherein the ionophore is salinomycin.
 28. A method for preventingdisease in an animal, comprising vaccinating the animal with acoccidiosis vaccine; and administering to the animal a compositioncomprising the composition of any one of claims 1 to
 8. 29. The methodof claim 28, wherein the animal is poultry and the disease is necroticenteritis.
 30. The method of claim 28, wherein the vaccine comprises anon-attenuated, live sporulated oocyst coccidiosis vaccine.
 31. Themethod of claim 28, wherein the coccidiosis vaccine is Coccivac®.
 32. Amethod for decreasing the mortality in an animal challenged with C.perfringens, comprising vaccinating the animal with a coccidiosisvaccine; and administering to the animal a composition comprising thecomposition of any one of claims 1 to
 8. 33. The method of claim 32wherein the animal is poultry.
 34. The method of claim 33, wherein thevaccine comprises a non-attenuated, live sporulated oocyst coccidiosisvaccine.
 35. The method of claim 34, wherein the coccidiosis vaccine isCoccivac®.
 36. A method for decreasing the necrotic enteritis lesions inan animal challenged with C. perfringens, comprising vaccinating theanimal with a coccidiosis vaccine; and administering to the animal acomposition comprising the composition of any one of claims 1 to
 8. 37.The method of claim 36 wherein the animal is poultry.
 38. The method ofclaim 36, wherein the vaccine comprises a non-attenuated, livesporulated oocyst coccidiosis vaccine.
 39. A composition comprising thecomposition of any one of claims 12 to 18 further comprising ananticoccidal ionophore.
 40. The composition of claim 39, wherein theanticoccidal ionophore is salinomycin:
 41. The composition of claim 40,wherein the salinomycin is present at a level of about 66 ppm of thecomposition.
 42. An animal feed composition comprising the compositionfor the treatment of necrotic enteritis in an animal of any one ofclaims 39 to 41, and an animal foodstuff, wherein the composition forthe treatment of a disease in an animal is in an amount of about 0.5pound to about 10 pounds per ton of the animal foodstuff.
 43. A methodfor improving the performance of an ionophore in the treatment ofnecrotic enteritis in an animal comprising administering to the animalthe composition of any one of claims 39 to
 41. 44. The method of claim43 wherein the ionophore is salinomycin.
 45. A method for preventingdisease in an animal, comprising vaccinating the animal with acoccidiosis vaccine; and administering to the animal a compositioncomprising the composition of any one of claims 12 to
 18. 46. The methodof claim 45, wherein the animal is poultry and the disease is necroticenteritis.
 47. The method of claim 45, wherein the vaccine comprises anon-attenuated, live sporulated oocyst coccidiosis vaccine.
 48. Themethod of claim 45, wherein the coccidiosis vaccine is Coccivac®.